Preparation Considerations
Cutting
Characteristics:
- Thermal spray specimens are coating/substrate systems rather than single homogeneous materials, and the coating and substrate may respond very differently during sectioning
- Many sprayed coatings contain inherent porosity, oxides, unmelted or partially melted particles, lamellar boundaries, and pre-existing microcracks that must be preserved rather than created or smeared
- The sprayed layer can delaminate, chip, or crack if it is unsupported or cut under unfavorable loading
- The main risk during cutting is disturbing the true coating/substrate interface before the mounting step even begins
More Attention:
- Blade selection based on the harder or more damage-sensitive constituent of the system, not just the substrate alone
- Cutting direction and specimen orientation so the coating remains supported and, where possible, the cut keeps the coating under compression
- Firm but padded clamping, especially near thin coatings, coated edges, or fragile test coupons
- Coolant delivery, cutting severity, and removal of debris from the cutting zone
- Whether sectioning has already introduced interfacial separation, edge chipping, or false crack networks
Avoid:
- Delamination at the coating/substrate interface
- Edge chipping, spallat ion, or breakout of the sprayed layer
- Subsurface cracking or smeared damage that masks the true lamellar structure
- Excessive heat or severe cutting that changes the apparent oxide or porosity distribution
- A cut face that already distorts coating thickness or adhesion before later preparation steps
Mounting
Characteristics:
- Many thermal spray coatings are porous, friable, or locally weak, so unsupported pores and splat boundaries can collapse or tear out during the first abrasive contact
- Accurate evaluation commonly depends on preserving edge retention, coating thickness, interface integrity, and true pore morphology
- Large differences in support between the coating, the substrate, and the mounting medium strongly influence later preparation damage
- Hot compression mounting is often too severe for delicate or weakly bonded thermal spray coatings
More Attention:
- Use of a low-viscosity castable epoxy that can penetrate pores, gaps, and crack- like features
- Vacuum impregnation or repeated vacuum cycling for porous, friable, or highly discontinuous coatings
- Orientation of the area of interest, especially coating thickness, multi-layer boundaries, and the coating/substrate interface
- Adhesion, shrinkage behavior, and uniform support around coated edges
- Stability of the specimen inside the mount before the grinding sequence starts
Avoid:
- Shrinkage gaps that leave the coating unsupported
- Poor impregnation that allows pores, oxides, or weak lamellae to break out during grinding
- High-pressure mounting conditions that damage the internal structure of the coating
- Specimen movement or interface opening inside the mount
- Mounting artifacts that are later mistaken for real porosity, cracking, or de bonding
Grinding
Characteristics:
- Grinding must remove sectioning damage while keeping the coating flat and fully supported against the substrate
- Coating and substrate often grind at different rates, so relief can develop quickly if stock removal is too aggressive or poorly controlled
- Porous, oxide-rich, or brittle coatings are more prone to pull-out and edge damage than to plastic smearing
- For many thermal spray systems, diamond grinding provides better control than relying only on conventional SiC paper
More Attention:
- Abrasive choice and cutting efficiency, especially when hard carbides, oxides, or ceramic spray layers are present
- Sample orientation so abrasives cut through the coating into the substrate rather than tending to lift the coating
- Flatness across the full cross-section, including the interface and near-edge regions
- Thorough cleaning between steps, because porous coatings can retain loose abrasive and contamination
- Whether each stage has fully removed prior damage before moving to a finer step
Avoid:
- Relief between coating and substrate, or between phases within the coating
- Pull-out of splats, carbides, oxides, or weakly bonded regions
- Embedded debris and cross-contamination in open porosity
- Microcracks or delamination carried forward into polishing
- A ground surface that looks uniform but no longer represents the true coating morphology
Polishing
Characteristics:
- Final polishing must reveal thickness, porosity, oxide distribution, splat morphology, cracks, and adhesion features without rounding or over-opening the structure
- Because thermal spray coatings are often multiphase and heterogeneous, different constituents may polish at different rates
- Weak lamellae, pores, and unmelted particles can be pulled out if the cloth and abrasive severity are not well matched
- The final objective is structural fidelity of the coating cross-section, not simply a bright-looking surface
More Attention:
- The cloth and abrasive combination for the specific coating type, especially the difference between ceramic and metallic thermal spray systems
- Force, lubrication, and polishing direction so the coating remains supported by the substrate
- The condition of the edge and the coating/substrate interface after fine polishing
- Whether pores are being enlarged artificially or weak constituents are breaking away during the finishing step
- Whether the final surface remains flat enough for reliable porosity, thickness, and adhesion assessment
Avoid:
- Pull-out during final polishing
- Excessive relief between hard and soft constituents
- Artificially opened pores, dragged metal, or rounded lamellar boundaries
- Edge rounding that changes the apparent coating thickness
- A polished surface that appears clean but misrepresents the true microstructure


One comment
Lindsey Rice
January 25, 2018 at 9:35 am
Quaerat fugiat ad omnis temporibus eos. Qui fuga repellat doloribus dignissimos vero voluptatum. Distinctio nobis quo qui eaque atque. Sit omnis qui sed enim quia.